Sunday, September 16, 2012

Updates and News Now on Facebook Page

Looking for the latest news from the Department of Linguistics? You'll find it on our Facebook page. Please update your links and join us for news and events. (You don't need a Facebook account to browse but if you want to say "hello" or leave a comment, sign up!). Thank you for following our blog! Now head over to the new page.

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

MUN Graduate Andrew Harvey at work in Africa

Recently, Andrew Harvey was featured on CBC's The St. John's Morning Show, talking about his linguistic work in Tanzania:

A young man from Mount Pearl is in the African country of Tanzania taking on an unusual challenge: Working on an alphabet for a community that uses an as-of-yet undescribed language. Andrew Harvey talks to John Furlong from Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania about his linguistic challenge. 

The entire interview can be heard on the CBC website here.

Congratulations to Andrew for his significant accomplishments! We wish him further success as he continues forward.

...and the FOG misses him too.



Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sara Johansson Wins CLA Student Paper Competition

A big congratulations to our MA student, Sara Johansson, winner of the 2012 Canadian Linguistic Association Student Paper Competition for her paper “Acquiring Northern East Cree verbal morphology: Evidence from inchoative verbs”.

France Martineau, president of CLA, relayed the following to Sara:

"This is a really wonderful achievement.  Your research was both original and ambitious, with your paper being characterized by outstanding treatment of interesting Northern East Cree data, methodological rigour, solid knowledge of issues in theoretical linguistics and language acquisition, and a thorough understanding of the relationship between your data and theory. Your presentation was strikingly articulate and matched by the quality of your handout. Congratulations!"


Monday, April 9, 2012

Seminar Series: final seminar

Our final seminar of the W12 semester will be held this Wed., April 11 from 2-3pm. We are pleased to have Ian Roberts from Cambridge University present his recent work with Theresa Biberauer. All are welcome.

The Significance of What Hasn’t Happened

Abstract

Naturally enough, the focus of diachronic syntax – and, indeed of historical linguistics more generally – has been on documenting and analyzing recorded instances of change. In a parametric model, this means trying to observe, describe and explain cases of parametric change. However, if change is viewed as abductive reanalysis of Primary Linguistic Data (PLD) in language acquisition, which, in part, also involves resetting parameter values of the underlying grammar (Lightfoot 1979, 1991, 1999), we expect acquisition mostly to be convergent and, thus, that little will change. This is the Inertia Principle of Keenan (2002) and Longobardi (1994), which we can phrase in parametric terms as:

(1) Most of the time, most parameter values don’t change.

(1) is almost certainly true, perhaps a truism. But in order to seriously understand both change and the nature of parameters, we need to qualify both occurrences of most. In other words, which parameters change and when? Are certain parameters more amenable to change than others? If so, what can we learn about parameters more generally from these changes? These are the questions this paper
investigates.

As we shall see, the cases where a given parameter does not change can be as revealing as those where it does.

A reception will follow in SN 3038. 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Next and Final Seminar for Winter 2012

NOTE ROOM CHANGE 

All are invited to our final seminar for the semester.

Ian Roberts (University of Cambridge)
will visit our Department on April 11 and will give a diachronic syntax talk called:

"On the Importance of What Doesn't Happen" 

When: April 11, 2:00-3:00pm
Where: SN 4063
Reception to follow. 

More info to come. 

Ian Roberts webpage can be found here:  http://www.ling.cam.ac.uk/people/roberts/

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Seminar Series: Yvan Rose




CANCELLED! CANCELLED! CANCELLED!



Our next seminar is March 26. Yvan Rose will talk on: 

Categories in Phonological Development: A Case Study


Where: SN 3060
Time: 3:15pm
All are welcome!

Abstract

Vihman & Croft (2007) propose a (radical) templatic approach to phonological development, whereby children build prosodic templates from phonetic evidence available in their target languages. At the centre of this proposal is an outright rejection of phonological features as independent categories in phonological representations. Building on earlier work by Levelt & van Oostendorp (2007), I argue for the need for features in phonological development. I investigate the parallel development of consonants and consonant clusters in data from one child, Dutch-learning Catootje (from the CLPF corpus, available through CHILDES/PhonBank). We observe the emergence of categorical behaviours, all of which can be captured appropriately in a theory that accepts the notion of phonological features. I take these observations as compelling evidence against Vihman & Croft's featureless approach to phonological representations.

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Seminar Series: Johansson and Britain


On March 12 (MONDAY), Sara Johansson and Julie Brittain will present their talk on 

"East Cree verbs of emission: A unified analysis of the inchoative (-piyi)"

in SN 3060 from 3:15 to 4:15. All are welcome.


ABSTRACT


The intransitive verb final -piyi in Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi (CMN) combines with roots to yield both unaccusative and unergative predicates (Hirose, 2003; Brittain, in press); unaccusatives have an internal (patient) argument while unergatives have an external argument. Brittain’s study of ROOT+piyi verbs in Quebec Naskapi identifies three broad semantic classes: (i) spontaneous unaccusatives (80% of data); (ii) unergative “vehicle verbs” (10%); and (iii) verbs of emission (10%), the syntactic status of which was not investigated. Brittain accounts for the fact that -piyi derives both unaccusatives and unergatives by extending to Naskapi Davis & Demirdache's (2000) Event Foregrounding Hypothesis: -piyi suppresses Process and foregrounds State in the Lexical Semantic Representation (LSR) of the root with which it pairs, yielding an unaccusative; -piyi fails to suppress Process if the root bears the feature [spatial], yielding an unergative. Root semantics thus determine the syntactic representation. In this paper, we present new data on verbs of emission in Northern East (NE) Cree, in order to develop a unified account of the entire morphological class of verbs derived by -piyi.[1]

We take verbs of emission to be verbs denoting the emission of sound, light, substance or smell, following Levin & Rappaport Hovav (1995), including English examples such as jingle, flash, ooze, and reek. We consider only the subset of NE Cree verbs of emission derived by -piyi. Consistent with Johansson & Ritter's (in press) study of verbs of emission in Blackfoot (Algonquian), we find evidence that these verbs take non-agentive external arguments, or “internal causers” (cf. Harley & Folli 2008, Levin & Rappaport Hovav 1995). In other words, the external argument of a verb of emission may be an inanimate entity, but it must have the internal capacity to generate the event: bell can be predicated of the verb ring, but whistle cannot. Verbs of emission constitute a third distinct syntactic class of piyi-derived verb: like unaccusatives, they are incompatible with agent-oriented adverbs such as ûshit 'deliberately' (1). Like unergative vehicle verbs, they are compatible with purpose clauses (2).

(1)     * ushit wî-shashwâwâ-pîyi-u âh    nîmit

purposely desid-jingle-inch-iin.3s pvb dance:cin.3s

Intended: 'She jingles on purpose while she dances.'

(2) kuishkushi-pîyi-u utâpan âh nitûmikuyin

whistle-inch-iin.3s train pvb call.for:cin.2s

'The train whistles for you to come.'



Unaccusative

Vehicle verb

Verb of emission

Agent-oriented adverb

û

ü

û

Purpose clause

û

ü

ü

We propose that NE Cree verbs of emission have a non-agentive external argument, as in

Blackfoot (Johansson & Ritter 2008), and suggest that this is because (like vehicle verbs) such roots bear the feature [spatial], resulting in the foregrounding of Process. We take NE Cree as further evidence for the notion of internal cause: both emitters and sentient agents are permissible external arguments as both are internal causers.



Abbreviations

2 – 2nd person; 3 – 3rd person; cin – conjunct indicative neutral; desid – desiderative;

iin – independent indicative neutral; inch – inchoative; pvb – preverb; s – singular



References

Brittain, Julie. In press. Root semantics as a determinant of syntactic representation: Evidence from Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi. In Rand Valentine and Monica Macaulay, eds. Papers of the 42nd Algonquian conference. New York: SUNY Press.

Davis, Henry & Hamida Demirdache. 2000. On lexical verb meanings: Evidence from Salish. In Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky, eds. Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax, pp. 97-142. Standford: CSLI.

Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley. 2008. Teleology and animacy in external arguments. Lingua 118:190-202.

Hirose, Tomio. 2003. Origins of predicates: Evidence from Plains Cree. New York: Routledge.

Johansson, Sara & Elizabeth Ritter. In press. Determinants of split intransitivity in Blackfoot: Evidence from verbs of emission. In Rand Valentine, ed. Papers of the 40th Algonquian conference. New York: SUNY Press.

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Speas, Margaret J. & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria di Scuillo, ed. Asymmetry in grammar, pp. 315-344. Amsterdam: Benjamins.




[1] Note that we re-elicited Brittain's (forthcoming) Naskapi data in NE Cree, and found no departures in speaker judgments across the two dialects.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Upcoming Seminar: Arthur Sullivan

"Quantifier Domain Restriction and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface"

Dr. Arthur Sullivan
Department of Philosophy
MUN

Abstract  

In this talk I will (i) explain one way in which the issue of  quantifier domain restriction arises in a canonical debate in the philosophy of language, and (ii) survey some of the recent philosophical work on the issue of quantifier domain restriction.  

Date: Monday, February 27, 2012 
Time: 3:15 pm 
Location: SN3060

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Q: What is Sociolinguistics?

A: Find out in Dr. Van Herk's brand new textbook!


Dr. Bubenik Retires


Congratulations to Dr. Vit Bubenik, whom we honoured today on his retirement from 38 years at Memorial. We wish you all the best!



Seminar Series Winter 2012


Here is the line-up for the Winter semester.

Arthur Sullivan (Dept of Philosophy): Feb 27, 3:15
TBA
http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~arthurs/

Sara Johansson & Julie Britain: March 12, 3:15
East Cree verbs of emission: A unified analysis of the inchoative (-piyi)

Sara Rose: March 19, 3:15
Ancient inflections: All's well that ends well! 

Yvan Rose: March 26, 3:15
TBA

Ian Roberts (University of Cambridge): April 10-11
TBA
http://www.ling.cam.ac.uk/people/roberts/

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

COOL Newsletter: Fall 2011 Volume 2, Issue 2

All the news that's fit to print! Find out about the most recent accomplishments of the COOL project (Cayuga: Our Oral Legacy). The COOL project's aims are "to increase the number of Cayuga speakers, fluency levels, and the number and variety of contexts in which Cayuga is spoken."   

More information available here.

Monday, November 14, 2011

Seminar Series Talk by Eric Acton, November 24


We are pleased to have Eric Acton (a PhD student at Stanford University) in town on November 24th to give us "That straight talk": Demonstratives, solidarity, and Sarah Palin. (Co-authored with Christopher Potts). All are welcome to attend. Time:  3:30. Location: SN 2098. 


Abstract


Sarah Palin’s manner of speaking has been the subject of both fervent praise and impassioned criticism.  Supporters find Palin’s speech to beaccessible, engaging, and “real” while opponents label her manner ofspeaking presumptuous, inauthentic, and “pseudo-folksy.” This talk focuses on one salient feature of Palin’s speech—namely, that characteristic use ofdemonstratives, as in the quote below from the 2008 vice-presidentialdebate:
 (1)   Americans are craving that straight talk. 
Echoing Lakoff (1974), Liberman (2008, 2010) claims that such “affective demonstratives…carry an emotional as well as demonstrative load,” byimplying a degree of “shared familiarity” between interlocutors.  In thistalk, I will present the results of two corpus-based experiments that speakto this claim.  The first, based on users’ responses to posts on a socialmedia web site, provides quantitative support for the notion thatdemonstratives can foster or manufacture a sense of familiarity, empathy,and solidarity.  The second examines the 2008 vice-presidential debate,showing that Palin used demonstratives at a much higher rate than heropponent, Joe Biden.  The results of the study further suggest that Palin’suse of demonstratives was part of a broader stylistic approach for engagingand aligning with her audience.The talk concludes by reflecting on how Palin’s use of demonstratives mayhelp to explain why her speech is so polarizing.




Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Sara Mackenzie To Give Upcoming Seminar Series Talk


When: November 17th at 3:30pm
Location: SN 2098

on the topic of

Contrast and phonological similarity: evidence from consonant harmony
This talk argues that phonological similarity is evaluated over contrastive, phonological features. Evidence for this position is provided through analyses of consonant harmony processes. Typological studies of consonant harmony (Hansson, 2001, 2010; Rose and Walker, 2004) have shown that similarity plays a role in consonant harmony patterning with only highly similar segments interacting as targets and triggers. In this talk, two types of cases provide evidence that the relevant properties determining interacting segments are contrastive phonological representations. In one type of case (e.g. Bumo Izon), segments that appear to share a phonetic class with participating segments fail to participate in harmony. In the second type of case (e.g. Dholuo and Anywa), consonant harmony patterns differ between languages with similar phonetic inventories. 

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

POSTPONED: Yvan Rose To Give Upcoming Seminar Series talk


POSTPONED!!
New Date TBA

Join us on December 1st in SN 2098 at 3:30 when Yvan Rose will speak on:

Categorical Development in Child Language: Some Preliminary Results

Abstract

Vihman & Croft (2007) propose a (radical) templatic approach to phonological development, whereby children build prosodic templates from phonetic evidence available in their target languages. At the centre of this proposal is an outright rejection of features as independent categories in phonological representations. Building on earlier work by Levelt & van Oostendorp (2007), I reject this (radical) claim, and argue for the need for features in phonological development. Building on an early research project on the parallel development of consonants and consonant clusters, I present data from child Catootje (from the CLPF Dutch acquisition corpus). Categorical behaviours are noted, all of which suggest a central role for features in segmental development.

Monday, October 17, 2011





Department of Linguistics

Presents

Dr. David Crystal

Renowned linguist Dr. David Crystal, who will receive an honorary degree at Memorial’s fall 2011 convocation ceremonies. He will also speak on the topic of:



Language Death: Writing the Obituary of Languages?


Half the languages of the world will die out within the next century. This talk reviews the way languages are dying, asks why, and then asks what can be done. It presents the arguments why people should be concerned, drawing a parallel with other ecological domains. For less academic occasions, such as literary festivals, the talk includes extracts from literature, and also from David Crystal's play 'Living On', which dramatizes the endangered language situation.  Time: 90 minutes.


DATE: Thursday, October 20th

TIME: 3:30 – 5:00 p.m.

PLACE: SN2098


Reception to follow
SN3036

Monday, September 19, 2011

Guest Speaker: Will Oxford, University of Toronto



We are pleased to welcome back Will Oxford on September 29 at 12:00 (noon) in SN 2064! He will be speaking on ""Patterns of contrast in Algonquian vowel systems". All are welcome to attend. 

Abstract

This presentation examines the historical development of Algonquian vowel systems from the perspective of contrastive underspecification.  The presentation is based on a survey of all major vowel changes across the Algonquian family (approximately 20 languages and 50 changes).  I will propose that Algonquian vowel systems fall into two basic contrastive types: (1) a place-based system found in Proto-Algonquian, the Central languages, and Blackfoot, and (2) a height-based system found in the Eastern languages, Cheyenne, and Arapaho-Atsina. Two striking but apparently unnoticed pan-Algonquian generalizations correspond with these contrastive types. The first generalization involves the merger of /e/, which has occurred in several Algonquian languages. In all languages with the place-based system,
/e/ merges with /i/, while in all languages with the height-based system, /e/ merges with /a/. The second generalization involves the development of innovative palatalization processes. In languages with the place-based system, palatalization always includes /i/ as a trigger, while languages with the height-based system repeatedly develop palatalization processes that are triggered by /e/ but not by /i/ (a typological oddity).  I will show how the contrastive model of phonological change attributes both of these correspondences to a common source, thus giving us a new insight into the underlying phonological structure of Algonquian.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Photos from Seminar Series Fall 2011

Thanks to all those who attended our first seminar series talks on September 9, 2011. Remember that all future talks will now take place on Thursdays at 3:30. Check back here for announcements regarding the next speakers and topics.

Mattias Hofmman: Mainland Canadian English Phonology in Newfoundland
Jennifer Thorburn: Co-Variation and the Linguistic Individual

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Osama Omari's PhD Defense

Osama will defend his dissertation, titled "Grammatical Subjects of Jordanian Arabic: Syntactic Discourse and Functions" on Friday, September 2, 2011 at 1:00 pm in IIC 2014. The examination is open to the public. Break a leg, Osama!